Not entirely unexpected: Obama to Seek New Assault Weapons Ban. A couple of short points to consider:
- The former “Assault Weapons” ban did not lower violent crime, and when it expired, violent crime did not increase.
- There is no such thing as an “Assault Weapon.” It is a figment of a politician’s imagination; a term invented to squelch debate on a subject. Most of the guns banned by the former law were not functionally different from “hunting weapons.” Also, ammunition magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds are illegal under the ban. Somehow, according to politicians, having 11 bullets in your hand gun to defend yourself is considered “too much,” but 10 is okay. (Arbitrary and illogical.)
But this has all been said before. Left wingers have an irrational fear of firearms, and now they are in a position of power to implement policy that appeals to their base. It doesn’t matter that the policy is emotional and infringes on the Constitutional rights of Americans.
So here’s the “funny” part, if this can ever be considered “funny.”
Holder (the Obama administration mouthpeice for infringment of Constitutional liberties) said:
“I think that will have a positive impact in Mexico, at a minimum.”
So, get this straight: Our president wants our Second Amendment rights infringed and one of the rationales is that it will help Mexico — a country where gun laws are doing nothing to stem rampant crime and corruption. Got that?
On a related note, I’m reading John Lott’s book Straight Shooting. A nice easy read, it’s a collection of a bunch of articles he’s written over the last few years on gun control topics.